Atlantic Fish Stocks at Risk? Politics Pushes Industrial Fishing Expansion

1
00:00:15,916 --> 00:00:19,828
Fishing pressure does not disappear, it just shifts.

2
00:00:20,088 --> 00:00:21,919
This is the How to Protect the Ocean podcast.

3
00:00:21,919 --> 00:00:30,854
And if you care about staying informed on the ocean every weekday, hit the follow button
right now so you don't miss tomorrow's story.

4
00:00:30,994 --> 00:00:32,275
This is what happened.

5
00:00:32,275 --> 00:00:44,262
In February, 2026, the White House released an executive action entitled Unleashing
American Commercial Fishing in the Atlantic, signaling a push to expand commercial fishing

6
00:00:44,262 --> 00:00:45,192
accent.

7
00:00:51,192 --> 00:00:58,244
Fishing pressure doesn't disappear, it just shifts.

8
00:00:58,244 --> 00:01:06,862
This is the How to Protect the Ocean podcast and if you care about staying informed on the
ocean every weekday, hit the follow button right now so you don't miss tomorrow's story.

9
00:01:06,862 --> 00:01:08,167
All right, here's what happened.

10
00:01:08,167 --> 00:01:17,069
In February, 2026, the White House released an executive action titled Unleash an American
Commercial Fishing in the Atlantic.

11
00:01:17,069 --> 00:01:21,098
It signals a push to expand commercial fishing access

12
00:01:21,098 --> 00:01:22,989
in federal Atlantic waters.

13
00:01:22,989 --> 00:01:33,075
So, the nine nautical mile mark of the state waters up to about 200 nautical miles off the
coastline for the exclusive economic zone.

14
00:01:33,075 --> 00:01:43,091
So, the policy uh frames the expanded fishing as an economic and food security
opportunity, trying to bring food prices down and help the economy.

15
00:01:43,091 --> 00:01:48,434
In a related legal opinion in the US department or in a...

16
00:01:48,494 --> 00:01:51,636
Let's start to head over again because I messed up the words.

17
00:01:51,636 --> 00:02:05,403
a related legal opinion from the US Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, it
outlines federal authority over offshore resource management and clarifies executive power

18
00:02:05,403 --> 00:02:06,504
in ocean governance.

19
00:02:06,504 --> 00:02:18,626
Now, this is something, this statement is something that I didn't read properly, is
something that is going to be crucial going forward with this Trump administration.

20
00:02:18,626 --> 00:02:21,107
because it's starting to say, you know what?

21
00:02:21,107 --> 00:02:24,209
We don't care what the science of fishery say.

22
00:02:24,209 --> 00:02:26,510
We don't care what is considered sustainable fishing.

23
00:02:26,510 --> 00:02:31,133
We are just going to max out because that's what this administration wants to do.

24
00:02:31,133 --> 00:02:33,874
It wants to drill baby drill.

25
00:02:33,874 --> 00:02:35,835
It wants to mine the deep sea.

26
00:02:35,835 --> 00:02:43,139
It wants to open up parks for resource extraction, like minerals and oil.

27
00:02:43,159 --> 00:02:48,416
Everything is being pushed to the max because they want to maximize everything

28
00:02:48,416 --> 00:02:50,407
except for renewable energy.

29
00:02:50,748 --> 00:02:53,890
That's what this Trump administration seems to be all about.

30
00:02:53,890 --> 00:03:04,677
And this opinion, this legal opinion from the the US Department of Justice Office of Legal
Counsel, basically saying, hey, we're going to say federal authority is going over

31
00:03:04,677 --> 00:03:09,461
offshore resource management and clarifies executive power in ocean governance.

32
00:03:09,461 --> 00:03:17,198
So this move places political momentum directly alongside existing science based fisheries
management frameworks.

33
00:03:17,198 --> 00:03:20,498
So it doesn't matter what the fisheries science says.

34
00:03:20,498 --> 00:03:28,478
It's basically saying, hey, you know what, if we decide as a political party or as a
government to say, you know what, we're just gonna fish this anyway, we're just gonna open

35
00:03:28,478 --> 00:03:31,238
up the Atlantic, that's what we're gonna do.

36
00:03:31,238 --> 00:03:35,018
So here's how fisheries, the US fisheries is managed normally.

37
00:03:35,018 --> 00:03:38,038
So the US uses stock assessments to determine population health.

38
00:03:38,038 --> 00:03:45,250
So it will sample a commercial fishery, it'll go through the scientific method, and it'll
say this is where

39
00:03:45,250 --> 00:03:46,320
the population is at.

40
00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:49,953
This is how many individuals there are, this is how much biomass they have.

41
00:03:49,953 --> 00:04:00,180
And to say, okay, what are the trends over the last couple of decades, or since ever
they've started these stock assessments, it's long term data, and they'll start to look at

42
00:04:00,180 --> 00:04:01,651
that data and they'll start to look at the trends.

43
00:04:01,651 --> 00:04:04,944
Has the population gone up, has it gone down, has it stayed still?

44
00:04:04,944 --> 00:04:12,715
And then there's all these management actions, I don't know why my voice cracked there,
but there's all these management actions that happen as this is done.

45
00:04:12,715 --> 00:04:12,965
Right?

46
00:04:12,965 --> 00:04:22,554
And so if the population goes down enough, if it's steep enough, then there'll be
management actions where there will be uh actions where, you know, you take the quota down

47
00:04:22,554 --> 00:04:25,917
and you move the quota so it goes down so you can't catch as many fish.

48
00:04:25,917 --> 00:04:30,281
Or they may not fish for that species in this particular season, or they may shorten that
season.

49
00:04:30,281 --> 00:04:35,626
There's all these different actions that they can do as NOAA, as managers of this
resource.

50
00:04:35,626 --> 00:04:37,327
So annual catch limits can change.

51
00:04:37,327 --> 00:04:39,691
They're set based on scientific advice.

52
00:04:39,691 --> 00:04:42,272
Rebuilding plans are required for over fish stock.

53
00:04:42,272 --> 00:04:48,103
So if the stock continues to go down and go down and go down in number in biomass, it
might be considered over fish.

54
00:04:48,103 --> 00:04:52,644
It might be considered critically endangered and go on the endangered species list.

55
00:04:52,725 --> 00:04:56,286
All these trigger these actions to be taken.

56
00:04:56,286 --> 00:05:02,787
So when there's rebuilding plans, basically saying that this population is going down, say
cod, it's gone down.

57
00:05:02,787 --> 00:05:06,298
We got to have a rebuilding plan to make sure that this gets up.

58
00:05:06,298 --> 00:05:09,549
And when it does get up, we will take different actions.

59
00:05:09,549 --> 00:05:15,549
So there's always, and usually includes monitoring a little bit more, some research, and
to just to kind of figure out what's happening.

60
00:05:15,549 --> 00:05:25,569
Is it just being overfished or are there other things like climate change or is there
other things that are going on in that area, like maybe something else has been fished

61
00:05:25,569 --> 00:05:29,249
that's affecting like the prey, that's affecting the prey of that area.

62
00:05:29,249 --> 00:05:31,069
So like it just, it depends on what it is.

63
00:05:31,069 --> 00:05:32,129
It could be marine pollution.

64
00:05:32,129 --> 00:05:33,889
It could be a lot of different things.

65
00:05:33,889 --> 00:05:39,009
So then they'll have like a regional fishery management councils, like in all these
different areas in the regions.

66
00:05:39,062 --> 00:05:42,274
And then they incorporate the science and stakeholder input.

67
00:05:42,274 --> 00:05:44,606
So not only is science taken, right?

68
00:05:44,606 --> 00:05:45,787
Science taken is done.

69
00:05:45,787 --> 00:05:55,684
And then all these other inputs from fishing communities, from unions, from uh other users
of the ocean, whether it be recreational, whether it be industrial, they all get together

70
00:05:55,684 --> 00:05:58,596
and they have these meetings and then they bang out a plan.

71
00:05:58,596 --> 00:06:06,181
And that plan is kind of set for the year, for the season, for the next five years, for
the next three years, depending on the region, depending on what they're looking at.

72
00:06:06,337 --> 00:06:17,040
So NOAA maintains that the US fisheries are among the most sustainably managed globally,
with many even previously over fish stocks rebuilt under science-driven quotas.

73
00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:26,683
Now lot of them have seen that rebuild happen, and it's a lot of times due to the
Magnuson-Stevenson Act, which is an act that Republicans put in place back in the 70s.

74
00:06:26,683 --> 00:06:30,364
They also put in the Marine Mammal Protection Act, they put in the Endangered Species Act.

75
00:06:30,364 --> 00:06:32,605
All these have helped rebuild

76
00:06:32,777 --> 00:06:39,443
stocks of fish as well as individual species like great white sharks and other places and
marine mammals and stuff.

77
00:06:39,443 --> 00:06:41,584
So all these have helped.

78
00:06:41,584 --> 00:06:49,731
All these little, these acts, these policies, I shouldn't say little, these big policies,
these written words that go into law and have been followed over the years and enforced

79
00:06:49,731 --> 00:06:58,308
over the years and managed properly over the years have helped rebuild these fisheries
even though they're probably not perfect and they're probably not exactly sustainably

80
00:06:58,308 --> 00:07:02,379
managed, they're probably one of the best managed fisheries in the world, some of them.

81
00:07:02,379 --> 00:07:03,949
Not all of them, but some of them.

82
00:07:03,950 --> 00:07:07,904
And that could probably be argued just in its own worth, because I haven't seen the exact
data.

83
00:07:07,904 --> 00:07:10,035
I'm just kind of assuming.

84
00:07:10,035 --> 00:07:11,396
But we have the data.

85
00:07:11,396 --> 00:07:13,268
We use science to drive the policy.

86
00:07:13,268 --> 00:07:22,145
The policy puts it in place, and then we have managers and regional councils and all the
fisheries management councils and everything to really go in to put together.

87
00:07:22,706 --> 00:07:25,408
Now here is what we're looking at globally.

88
00:07:25,408 --> 00:07:31,766
oh So from the state of the world fisheries and aquaculture, more than one third of
assessed global fish stocks

89
00:07:31,766 --> 00:07:34,327
are overfished, so they're in trouble.

90
00:07:34,487 --> 00:07:39,068
Overcapacity and public pressure remain key drivers in the depletion worldwide.

91
00:07:39,068 --> 00:07:49,451
The science will show the trends, and they're right, the science is right, they'll see the
trends, they'll identify the problems that these stocks are having, whether they're

92
00:07:49,451 --> 00:07:53,872
overfished, whether they're on a downward trend, whether they're on an upward trend for
the rebuilding.

93
00:07:54,173 --> 00:07:59,754
But then what happens is politics and stakeholders get together and they decide, hey, you
know what?

94
00:07:59,778 --> 00:08:03,379
We actually want to fish more because the economy is not doing so well this year.

95
00:08:03,379 --> 00:08:10,140
So we're actually going to fish more, even though we know that if we fish more, we're
going to make that population even worse.

96
00:08:10,140 --> 00:08:13,601
We understand that and we're ready to take that into play.

97
00:08:13,601 --> 00:08:16,242
Not the greatest, but they're ready to take that into play.

98
00:08:16,502 --> 00:08:18,262
And so that happens a lot.

99
00:08:18,482 --> 00:08:21,760
A great example of that is Fishing Down the Line.

100
00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:25,404
I believe is the end of the line is the movie that we saw in the 90s.

101
00:08:25,404 --> 00:08:26,954
It was narrated by Ted Danson.

102
00:08:26,954 --> 00:08:28,645
I think it was sponsored by Oceana.

103
00:08:28,645 --> 00:08:30,035
They looked at

104
00:08:30,445 --> 00:08:34,025
fisheries in the US, tuna fisheries, and sorry, in Europe.

105
00:08:34,105 --> 00:08:44,165
They looked at tuna fisheries in Europe and they started to look at, here's what, you the
science says that you are allowed to take 30,000 tons of tuna.

106
00:08:44,165 --> 00:08:45,765
Okay, great, that's what the science says.

107
00:08:45,765 --> 00:08:48,565
If you do this, it'll be sustainably managed.

108
00:08:48,565 --> 00:08:55,825
Right away, the decision makers are like, we're gonna double that because we know that the
stocks, like the stakeholders are not gonna like that.

109
00:08:55,825 --> 00:08:57,525
So we're gonna double that to 60,000.

110
00:08:57,525 --> 00:08:59,607
So they're actually, you know,

111
00:08:59,607 --> 00:09:03,458
two times the catch limit they're allowing to fish.

112
00:09:03,458 --> 00:09:08,859
So they do that and then after those meetings it got upped again to like 90,000 or 100,000
tons.

113
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:12,581
Almost three times as much as it was originally said to be sustainably caught.

114
00:09:12,581 --> 00:09:16,682
This is what happens a lot of times and it depends on a lot of world factors.

115
00:09:17,102 --> 00:09:20,923
But where science-based limits are ignored or weakened, the stock starts to decline.

116
00:09:20,923 --> 00:09:24,064
It follows, we see this every single time.

117
00:09:24,064 --> 00:09:25,594
You listen to the science, you'll get it.

118
00:09:25,594 --> 00:09:28,775
It doesn't always fit the narrative that we want.

119
00:09:29,483 --> 00:09:39,441
If we see a declining fishery stock and the economy is not doing that great, or the
fisheries are having trouble, or inflation moves upwards and it's more expensive to

120
00:09:39,441 --> 00:09:43,884
maintain the boat, so people need more fish, well, it becomes a difficult situation.

121
00:09:43,884 --> 00:09:44,865
It's not easy.

122
00:09:44,865 --> 00:09:46,596
We want to look out for fishery in communities.

123
00:09:46,596 --> 00:09:48,228
We want to look out for fishers.

124
00:09:48,228 --> 00:09:53,591
And a lot of times it's the artisanal fishers, the smaller scale fishers that actually pay
the price.

125
00:09:54,753 --> 00:09:55,573
Right?

126
00:09:55,573 --> 00:09:59,155
We need to ensure that those are protected, but there's a lot of stuff that goes on.

127
00:09:59,155 --> 00:10:06,299
Industrial fishing usually wins out because they have the money and they tend to get to
the politicians that want this stuff happen.

128
00:10:06,299 --> 00:10:10,571
So this matters because policy shifts do not occur in isolation.

129
00:10:10,571 --> 00:10:16,744
Fishing fleets are mobile, markets are global, and pressure often relocates rather than
disappears.

130
00:10:17,065 --> 00:10:23,712
So sometimes we see illegal fisheries happen that affects how regularly fishing is
managed.

131
00:10:23,712 --> 00:10:30,874
And it's not fair to the fishers who fish regularly, but they may have to have lower uh
quotas because of the illegal fishers.

132
00:10:31,114 --> 00:10:32,814
So it's not really that great.

133
00:10:32,895 --> 00:10:41,907
But if this is the kind of breakdown you want and you find this helpful, make sure you hit
that follow button on the show so you can follow the show and I drop new episodes every

134
00:10:41,907 --> 00:10:43,438
weekday morning.

135
00:10:44,038 --> 00:10:46,919
Now here's the tension around all of this stuff.

136
00:10:46,959 --> 00:10:49,959
The economic expansion increases the effort.

137
00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:51,752
The number of vessels

138
00:10:51,752 --> 00:10:52,913
and access areas.

139
00:10:52,913 --> 00:10:59,538
So more people are fishing, more boats are fishing, they're fishing for longer, and the
access increases.

140
00:10:59,538 --> 00:11:02,140
So you're having less special places protected.

141
00:11:04,032 --> 00:11:15,991
Right, there's even a meeting or public period to reduce the, uh I believe it's a marine
monument, the C-mounts, the canyons and C-mounts marine monument along the East Coast so

142
00:11:15,991 --> 00:11:17,982
that we can increase fishing pressure.

143
00:11:18,583 --> 00:11:23,847
So scientific quota systems only work when the political actors respect the stock limits.

144
00:11:23,847 --> 00:11:26,189
This is not the case in the US right now.

145
00:11:26,189 --> 00:11:28,851
They're just saying, hey, you know what, you guys wanna fish more?

146
00:11:28,851 --> 00:11:30,532
You can go ahead and fish more.

147
00:11:31,297 --> 00:11:35,981
Don't worry about the catch limits, don't worry about this, you'll get access to areas and
all that kind of stuff.

148
00:11:35,981 --> 00:11:37,382
Just fish more.

149
00:11:37,543 --> 00:11:39,264
It's irresponsible.

150
00:11:39,997 --> 00:11:43,888
And of course legal authority clarifies power, but science determines sustainability.

151
00:11:43,888 --> 00:11:51,535
So no matter what you say, in terms of like, this is what I'm gonna fish now, no matter
what you say, the stock is still gonna decline.

152
00:11:51,535 --> 00:11:56,259
And eventually, your stock is gonna be over fish and you can't fish it anymore because
it's not gonna be worth it.

153
00:11:56,259 --> 00:11:58,837
It's gonna be too expensive for fishers to do it.

154
00:11:58,837 --> 00:12:01,729
It's not going to be big enough for the effort, right?

155
00:12:01,729 --> 00:12:05,060
The actual biomass is going to go down and the number are going to go down.

156
00:12:05,060 --> 00:12:10,213
So if access expands faster than the assessments adapt, right?

157
00:12:10,213 --> 00:12:16,126
Than these stock assessments adapt, risk will increase of actually overfishing that
species.

158
00:12:16,727 --> 00:12:24,870
So when the economic policy accelerates fishing access, how do we ensure stock limits
remain science driven?

159
00:12:25,311 --> 00:12:27,622
This is the big problem that we're seeing.

160
00:12:28,096 --> 00:12:36,380
And I'd love to hear your answer on this because well managed fisheries can deliver food
security and economic stability no matter how big the access area is.

161
00:12:36,380 --> 00:12:45,093
If you manage it properly, set the proper quotas, make sure that there's enough boats out
there to sustainably fish, you will get the maximum economic yield.

162
00:12:45,093 --> 00:12:54,567
It just may not be what you expect, but just because we don't believe the science doesn't
mean we're not gonna affect the actual fish stock.

163
00:12:54,696 --> 00:12:56,818
Right, that's just really what it comes down to.

164
00:12:57,696 --> 00:13:03,329
Politically accelerated access without scientific guardrails can reverse rebuilding gains.

165
00:13:03,329 --> 00:13:12,824
All the rebuilding that we've done, if you just start to openly say, hey, fish as much as
you want, you're going to reduce all of that effort and all the sacrifices that the

166
00:13:12,824 --> 00:13:17,046
fishing community and others have made in the past all in one swoop.

167
00:13:17,156 --> 00:13:19,488
It doesn't take much to overfish.

168
00:13:20,469 --> 00:13:23,530
And sustainable management is not automatic.

169
00:13:23,530 --> 00:13:27,232
It requires constant enforcement and independent science.

170
00:13:27,680 --> 00:13:28,560
That's what it really does.

171
00:13:28,560 --> 00:13:29,510
That's what it comes down to.

172
00:13:29,510 --> 00:13:31,801
Fishing pressure does not disappear.

173
00:13:31,801 --> 00:13:33,121
It shifts.

174
00:13:33,502 --> 00:13:38,743
The question is whether it shifts within sustainable limits or beyond them.

175
00:13:39,543 --> 00:13:40,984
That's the episode for today.

176
00:13:40,984 --> 00:13:42,544
I'd love to hear your comments.

177
00:13:42,544 --> 00:13:43,444
Let me know.

178
00:13:43,444 --> 00:13:51,557
Go to speakupforblue.com forward slash feedback and hit that like button if you want
access to more ocean news information.

179
00:13:51,557 --> 00:13:53,487
Hit the like or follow.

180
00:13:53,487 --> 00:13:55,360
Really follow, because I'd love to hear.

181
00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:57,300
I'd love to see you follow this episode.

182
00:13:57,300 --> 00:13:59,585
or this podcast because I think it'd be great.

183
00:13:59,585 --> 00:14:03,362
So thank you so much for joining me on today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean
podcast.

184
00:14:03,362 --> 00:14:04,634
I'm your host, Andrew Lewin.

185
00:14:04,634 --> 00:14:05,295
Have a great day.

186
00:14:05,295 --> 00:14:08,080
We'll talk to you next time and happy conservation.