Aug. 25, 2026

Corals Nearly as Old as the Pyramids, and the Fight to Save Them

Corals Nearly as Old as the Pyramids, and the Fight to Save Them

Somewhere on the ocean floor right now, a coral colony has been growing since before the Great Pyramid of Giza was finished. One deep-water black coral off the coast of Hawaii has been dated at 4,270 years old, making it one of the oldest living skeleton-building organisms known to science. A single pass of a bottom trawl net can wipe out that kind of habitat in seconds, and it's a fight that's still being decided this very year at the United Nations.

In this episode, Andrew breaks down why bottom trawling is such a hard problem to regulate. It's rarely the fish stock itself that takes the worst damage. It's the seafloor habitat those fish depend on to hide, feed, and survive, and that habitat can take centuries to rebuild once it's gone. Andrew traces the policy fight behind this back to a failed 2004 push for an outright ban on high seas bottom trawling, the 2006 compromise that did pass (UN Resolution 61/105), and the recurring cycle of reviews since then that have kept tightening the rules bit by bit.

That fight isn't a closed chapter. A UN preparatory workshop on bottom fishing's impact on vulnerable marine ecosystems was held in July 2026, feeding into a full General Assembly review later this year, with advocates pushing for a firm, time-bound end to seamount trawling on the high seas by 2027. Andrew connects it to Canada's own back-and-forth over fish habitat protection in the Fisheries Act, and sets up Friday's interview with the guest who chaired the UN fisheries negotiations that started this whole process.

Takeaways:

  • Some deep-sea corals have been alive for thousands of years, and a single trawl pass can destroy that habitat in seconds.
  • Bottom trawling's real damage usually lands on the seafloor habitat fish depend on, not the fish stock itself.
  • The landmark 2006 UN resolution on bottom trawling (Resolution 61/105) was a hard-fought compromise reached after an outright ban failed in 2004.
  • International ocean policy almost never arrives finished. It gets built in stages and strengthened through repeated review cycles.
  • A new UN review is underway in 2026, with advocates pushing for a firm end to seamount bottom trawling by 2027.

Support Independent Podcasts: https://www.speakupforblue.com/patreon

Need help with your ocean non-profit, company, or project? Get the help you need with Pisces Oceans Inc.: https://www.piscesoceans.ca

Connect with Speak Up For Blue
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube


Transcript
1
00:00:00,050 --> 00:00:03,850
Somewhere on the ocean floor right now,
there's a coral colony that has already

2
00:00:03,850 --> 00:00:05,740
been, like, a thousand years old.

3
00:00:06,013 --> 00:00:09,103
It even been around as the
pyramids were being built.

4
00:00:09,533 --> 00:00:13,673
It's older than most of recorded human
history, and a single pass of a trawling

5
00:00:13,673 --> 00:00:15,923
net could wipe it out in seconds.

6
00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:20,259
And that is the fight that my
interview on Friday, the person

7
00:00:20,259 --> 00:00:21,460
I'm interviewing on Friday found

8
00:00:21,639 --> 00:00:25,160
themselves in negotiating
in a windowless UN rooms.

9
00:00:25,266 --> 00:00:29,543
and it's a fight that is still
being decided this very year.

10
00:00:29,993 --> 00:00:34,652
So, you know, when we talk about
protecting the bottom of the ocean.

11
00:00:34,772 --> 00:00:38,532
We talked last week about how there is
room on the bottom, there's lots of life

12
00:00:38,532 --> 00:00:41,942
on the bottom of the deep sea, whether
it's on a seamount, whether it's in

13
00:00:41,942 --> 00:00:45,759
the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, there is
life on the bottom, and it's a habitat.

14
00:00:46,039 --> 00:00:50,409
And rarely do we see habitats on the
list of, like, when a trawl net goes

15
00:00:50,409 --> 00:00:51,719
through, a bottom trawl net goes through.

16
00:00:51,879 --> 00:00:54,839
It's not the fish that actually are
bothered, it's the trawl destroys

17
00:00:54,849 --> 00:00:56,779
the habitat where the fish go.

18
00:00:56,779 --> 00:00:59,579
I mean, the fish go in, they're obviously
bothered, they get caught, but it's

19
00:00:59,589 --> 00:01:03,809
really the destruction that is caused
by that trawl, that bottom trawl, that

20
00:01:03,849 --> 00:01:06,569
actually scrapes the bottom of the ocean.

21
00:01:06,746 --> 00:01:09,629
And whether it's in the deep sea or
in the shallows, it gets destroyed.

22
00:01:09,936 --> 00:01:14,032
And so the person that we're interviewing
on Friday, I'm kinda doing a little bit of

23
00:01:14,032 --> 00:01:18,446
a mystery here, they were part of what we
call, like, the high seas discrete stocks.

24
00:01:18,446 --> 00:01:21,875
So it's specifically bottom
fishing and bottom trawling.

25
00:01:22,079 --> 00:01:25,809
And this person was chairing the UN
fisheries negotiations at the time.

26
00:01:26,112 --> 00:01:29,652
And like I said before, what's actually
being damaged is the habitat, not

27
00:01:29,652 --> 00:01:31,672
the fish stocks itself necessarily.

28
00:01:31,732 --> 00:01:33,896
Obviously, they're getting
caught, but it's not as if they

29
00:01:33,896 --> 00:01:35,935
can be degraded in one pass.

30
00:01:36,009 --> 00:01:39,249
But the habitat can be destroyed,
and if the habitat is destroyed,

31
00:01:39,362 --> 00:01:42,582
the fish eventually will go away if
there's enough habitat or there's

32
00:01:42,592 --> 00:01:43,782
not enough habitat to live in.

33
00:01:44,005 --> 00:01:46,125
' Cause you gotta remember,
fish need hiding spots.

34
00:01:46,155 --> 00:01:46,895
They need food.

35
00:01:46,905 --> 00:01:47,655
They need areas.

36
00:01:47,655 --> 00:01:48,275
They need a home.

37
00:01:48,495 --> 00:01:50,145
These habitats provide that home.

38
00:01:50,429 --> 00:01:53,049
It's rare that you'll see a lot
of bottom-dwelling fish that are

39
00:01:53,049 --> 00:01:55,339
out in the open 'cause then they
can get caught by predators.

40
00:01:55,565 --> 00:01:56,235
They don't want that.

41
00:01:56,435 --> 00:01:59,825
They wanna make sure that they
can actually be protected, and

42
00:01:59,825 --> 00:02:02,349
they can hide, and they can do
what they need to do to survive.

43
00:02:02,605 --> 00:02:04,515
So we have to protect the bottom.

44
00:02:04,615 --> 00:02:06,375
We have to protect the habitats.

45
00:02:06,899 --> 00:02:10,519
And I think, when you start to look
at a lot of these corals that have

46
00:02:10,519 --> 00:02:14,402
been growing for centuries, and some
of them are thousands of years old.

47
00:02:14,402 --> 00:02:18,925
Like, some of them have been dated, like,
4,270 years old off the coast of Hawaii.

48
00:02:19,229 --> 00:02:21,169
These are Leiopathes species, right?

49
00:02:21,169 --> 00:02:23,099
I think that's how you
pronounce it, Leopathes species.

50
00:02:23,192 --> 00:02:24,672
basically deep-water black coral.

51
00:02:24,872 --> 00:02:27,692
And so the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory researchers

52
00:02:27,702 --> 00:02:31,159
dated those 4,270 years old.

53
00:02:31,619 --> 00:02:34,279
It's one of the oldest
living skeleton-building

54
00:02:34,279 --> 00:02:36,109
marine organisms we know.

55
00:02:36,389 --> 00:02:40,324
This is an organism that builds
its corals as it grows up.

56
00:02:40,354 --> 00:02:44,864
It takes a while to grow, but it has this
intricate, like, habitat-forming ability.

57
00:02:45,190 --> 00:02:48,760
Now, just a comparison when people
say it's as almost as old as pyramids.

58
00:02:48,866 --> 00:02:52,726
The Great Pyramid of Giza is
roughly 4,500 years old, so it's

59
00:02:52,726 --> 00:02:55,266
just about 250 years shy of that.

60
00:02:55,606 --> 00:02:58,706
So it's a little bit younger, not
older, but it's still important.

61
00:02:58,986 --> 00:03:03,406
And that same research body that
actually did the black coral aging,

62
00:03:03,500 --> 00:03:06,300
they said that bottom trawling,
commercial bottom trawling, is the

63
00:03:06,300 --> 00:03:10,650
direct threat to these corals, alongside
of, like, harvesting for jewelry and

64
00:03:10,650 --> 00:03:12,180
things like that for these corals.

65
00:03:12,486 --> 00:03:14,846
So, you can't just smash
through this stuff.

66
00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:16,140
You have to be careful.

67
00:03:16,366 --> 00:03:22,303
You have to have rules so that you can
sit there and enjoy the fruits of the

68
00:03:22,303 --> 00:03:24,683
labor of these habitat-forming corals.

69
00:03:25,043 --> 00:03:30,193
So as the problem that is at hand
is that you have these slow-growing,

70
00:03:30,193 --> 00:03:34,113
thousand-year-old corals that need to
be protected because we need to protect

71
00:03:34,113 --> 00:03:35,733
the fish, the longevity of the fish.

72
00:03:35,743 --> 00:03:38,430
You want a sustainable fishery,
you have to protect the habitats

73
00:03:38,460 --> 00:03:39,760
that can house the fish.

74
00:03:40,090 --> 00:03:40,740
Pretty simple.

75
00:03:41,086 --> 00:03:43,960
It's not difficult to
understand that concept.

76
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,810
Now, there has to be some kind of
response to say, "Hey, we need to

77
00:03:47,810 --> 00:03:52,890
protect this." So, there was a landmark
international agreement negotiated by

78
00:03:52,890 --> 00:03:56,800
the person I'm talking to on Friday, who
was chairing the UN fisheries talks to

79
00:03:56,810 --> 00:04:00,650
mitigate the impact of bottom fishing and
bottom trawling on vulnerable seabeds.

80
00:04:01,186 --> 00:04:04,656
They call it a step function
change in how the type of fishery

81
00:04:04,656 --> 00:04:06,296
is managed internationally.

82
00:04:06,699 --> 00:04:12,929
And so I think this was the UN General
Assembly Resolution 61/108 in 2006, right?

83
00:04:12,929 --> 00:04:17,386
It's a landmark resolution that first
called on states, and you have these

84
00:04:17,456 --> 00:04:20,796
regional management organizations,
regional fisheries management

85
00:04:20,796 --> 00:04:25,666
organizations, which are these large
organizational areas, management

86
00:04:25,666 --> 00:04:28,716
organizations that are managed by
a number of different countries.

87
00:04:28,966 --> 00:04:30,296
Like, it depends on where they are.

88
00:04:30,296 --> 00:04:31,226
They're all over the world, though.

89
00:04:31,226 --> 00:04:32,246
They cover most of the world.

90
00:04:32,576 --> 00:04:36,976
And so they protect vulnerable ecosystems
like seamounts, hydrothermal vents,

91
00:04:36,976 --> 00:04:40,742
cold water corals, anything of that
nature from destructive bottom fishing.

92
00:04:41,036 --> 00:04:45,706
And it's by conducting impact assessments
and closing high seas areas where

93
00:04:45,706 --> 00:04:49,916
these vulnerable marine ecosystems
are known or likely to occur unless

94
00:04:49,936 --> 00:04:51,576
proper safeguards are in place.

95
00:04:51,969 --> 00:04:55,582
So I think it's a landmark policy
'cause it took probably about 13

96
00:04:55,592 --> 00:04:59,052
years of the State Department's Office
of Marine Conservation that engaged

97
00:04:59,052 --> 00:05:02,462
in these fisheries negotiations
regionally in the Pacific and globally

98
00:05:02,462 --> 00:05:04,272
at the United Nations and FAO.

99
00:05:04,789 --> 00:05:07,829
And, um, you know, there's a
co-authored paper, like a law

100
00:05:07,849 --> 00:05:11,319
review piece specifically on the
UN fish stocks agreement review

101
00:05:11,319 --> 00:05:12,899
process, all that kind of stuff.

102
00:05:12,899 --> 00:05:15,029
So there's a lot of documentation on this.

103
00:05:15,282 --> 00:05:20,792
And the negotiation that happened
to create this protection and to

104
00:05:20,792 --> 00:05:23,722
make sure that an impact assessment
has to be done in areas that we

105
00:05:23,722 --> 00:05:24,912
just don't know what's happening.

106
00:05:25,239 --> 00:05:26,989
It doesn't always happen cleanly.

107
00:05:27,009 --> 00:05:28,139
It doesn't always happen in the first try.

108
00:05:28,149 --> 00:05:30,112
It doesn't say that, " Hey,"
you know, when I explained it

109
00:05:30,112 --> 00:05:31,322
earlier, I said it's pretty simple.

110
00:05:31,322 --> 00:05:35,592
You have these thousand-year-old corals
that form this habitat to protect fish.

111
00:05:35,922 --> 00:05:38,609
Without this habitat, there isn't
gonna be any fish in that area.

112
00:05:39,029 --> 00:05:41,666
They'll go somewhere else or
they'll be caught really quickly.

113
00:05:41,676 --> 00:05:44,886
So you have fisheries, bottom trawls,
that come down and scrape the bottom

114
00:05:44,926 --> 00:05:48,249
and destroy parts of the habitat, you
get less fish 'cause there's not as much

115
00:05:48,249 --> 00:05:50,419
habitat, or if there's habitat at all.

116
00:05:50,812 --> 00:05:52,749
And those fish don't always come
back ' cause the corals take

117
00:05:52,749 --> 00:05:54,369
a long time to grow down there.

118
00:05:54,772 --> 00:05:57,252
But if you say that to a policy, you
say it to a bunch of countries, well,

119
00:05:57,252 --> 00:05:59,342
they're just like, " The people in
our country need to fish that area

120
00:05:59,342 --> 00:06:00,892
because they depend on it for fisheries.

121
00:06:01,372 --> 00:06:02,352
Their lives depend on it.

122
00:06:02,352 --> 00:06:03,332
Their livelihoods depend on it.

123
00:06:03,372 --> 00:06:04,082
Their kids depend on it.

124
00:06:04,082 --> 00:06:04,742
Their families depend on it.

125
00:06:04,802 --> 00:06:07,686
They're gonna continue to fish." So
we are advocating for those people.

126
00:06:07,686 --> 00:06:10,379
We are making sure that we can get, not
only advocating for the people, but of

127
00:06:10,379 --> 00:06:11,789
course the countries get money from this.

128
00:06:11,919 --> 00:06:14,109
It's a big part of
their GDP in some cases.

129
00:06:14,569 --> 00:06:17,449
So the policy doesn't happen just clean,
like, "Hey, we need to protect this area.

130
00:06:17,449 --> 00:06:18,339
Yes, I agree.

131
00:06:18,339 --> 00:06:19,139
That's how it's gonna happen.

132
00:06:19,209 --> 00:06:21,029
Let's protect it." No, it
doesn't happen that way.

133
00:06:21,422 --> 00:06:23,522
I'm gonna talk a little bit
about the drama that happened.

134
00:06:23,739 --> 00:06:28,099
In November 2004, the UN General Assembly
rejected an earlier push for an outright

135
00:06:28,099 --> 00:06:30,129
moratorium on high seas bottom trawling.

136
00:06:30,556 --> 00:06:33,166
And just like last week when we
talked to Matthew Gianni, the Deep

137
00:06:33,166 --> 00:06:36,569
Sea Conservation Coalition, which
he's part of and co-founded, led

138
00:06:36,569 --> 00:06:38,109
the campaign for a temporary ban.

139
00:06:38,322 --> 00:06:42,962
Opposition led by Iceland and the EU,
particularly Spain, defeated that ban

140
00:06:43,026 --> 00:06:46,866
and responsibility for high seas bottom
trawl of fishing was left to individual

141
00:06:46,866 --> 00:06:48,846
nations and regional bodies instead.

142
00:06:49,242 --> 00:06:52,192
So it didn't really help, you know,
that first pass didn't really help.

143
00:06:52,459 --> 00:06:56,849
Then two years later in 2006, the
compromise that did pass was Resolution

144
00:06:56,849 --> 00:06:59,686
61/105 Not a ban necessarily.

145
00:06:59,686 --> 00:07:02,592
Again, it doesn't always happen the way
we want, but a requirement for an impact

146
00:07:02,592 --> 00:07:04,962
assessment and area closures, right?

147
00:07:04,962 --> 00:07:08,382
This is like the step function change
that the person of the subject of

148
00:07:08,383 --> 00:07:10,192
Friday's interview was talking about.

149
00:07:10,583 --> 00:07:12,902
It's where you get what you can get.

150
00:07:13,172 --> 00:07:15,662
You can get something in
there that everybody agrees

151
00:07:15,662 --> 00:07:17,612
to as the base of this policy.

152
00:07:18,112 --> 00:07:21,982
It's a real-world example of everything
that happens in conservation.

153
00:07:21,982 --> 00:07:25,742
It's never the perfect scenario
because some countries or one

154
00:07:25,742 --> 00:07:28,772
country or two countries or 10
countries want something different.

155
00:07:29,177 --> 00:07:32,450
And when it comes to fishing, countries
have a long culture in fishing, and

156
00:07:32,450 --> 00:07:34,840
they wanna keep going to seeing what
they're doing 'cause nobody's ever

157
00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:36,474
told them to stop before, right?

158
00:07:36,474 --> 00:07:40,694
So successful international policy is
often the strong but imperfect deal that

159
00:07:40,694 --> 00:07:45,237
keeps everyone in the tent, so everyone in
the area, not the ideal income that we all

160
00:07:45,237 --> 00:07:46,987
expect that advocates originally wanted.

161
00:07:47,077 --> 00:07:48,027
It's never that.

162
00:07:48,434 --> 00:07:51,564
Now, the story doesn't end in
2006 for this document, for

163
00:07:51,564 --> 00:07:52,824
this regulation, this policy.

164
00:07:53,290 --> 00:07:56,630
The UN has kept reviewing the
implementation on a roughly

165
00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:58,480
recurring cycle, every so often.

166
00:07:58,870 --> 00:08:01,560
So, uh, in 2009, it sharpened
the impact assessment and

167
00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:03,070
stock assessment requirements.

168
00:08:03,487 --> 00:08:07,577
In 2011, it required assessments to be
made public, which it wasn't before, so

169
00:08:07,577 --> 00:08:08,987
again, it's getting better and better.

170
00:08:09,194 --> 00:08:13,964
In 2016, it tied assessments to FAO,
Food and Agriculture Organization

171
00:08:13,974 --> 00:08:18,434
guidelines, which is a UN body, and a
further resolution followed in 2022.

172
00:08:18,807 --> 00:08:23,054
As the years go on, as it gets reviewed
and as they see how things are changing

173
00:08:23,054 --> 00:08:27,134
or not changing, there are more
restrictions and there's more added to

174
00:08:27,154 --> 00:08:28,794
these guidelines and to these policies.

175
00:08:29,154 --> 00:08:30,574
This is live right now.

176
00:08:30,780 --> 00:08:34,870
It's a preparatory UN workshop on
bottom fishing impacts on vulnerable

177
00:08:34,870 --> 00:08:39,400
marine ecosystems that was held just
this past year in July 13th and 14th at

178
00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:44,164
UN headquarters in New York City, and
feeding into like a full UN General

179
00:08:44,164 --> 00:08:45,634
Assembly review later this year.

180
00:08:46,070 --> 00:08:49,450
Now, the Deep Sea Conservation
Coalition is publicly pushing for

181
00:08:49,450 --> 00:08:53,030
a firm time-bound resolution to
end bottom trawling on seamounts in

182
00:08:53,030 --> 00:08:54,890
the high seas by the end of 2027.

183
00:08:54,900 --> 00:08:59,640
And it ties into the Kunming Montreal
Global Biodiversity Framework and the

184
00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:03,147
High Seas Treaty like what we're gonna
be talking about in the next episode.

185
00:09:03,584 --> 00:09:04,994
So everything is kinda connected.

186
00:09:05,004 --> 00:09:08,554
All these policies are kinda relying
on each other, or there's… As you

187
00:09:08,554 --> 00:09:12,674
build this policy framework around
the ocean, whether it's the high

188
00:09:12,674 --> 00:09:16,750
seas, whether it's regional fisheries
management organizations, it's

189
00:09:16,790 --> 00:09:19,204
all tied together at some point.

190
00:09:19,294 --> 00:09:20,197
They all overlap.

191
00:09:20,677 --> 00:09:24,217
You have to remember, like the
ocean floor holds these gorgeous

192
00:09:24,217 --> 00:09:28,037
old living structures that are older
than some of the buildings, like most

193
00:09:28,037 --> 00:09:29,347
of the buildings in human history.

194
00:09:29,857 --> 00:09:33,117
And industrial fishing gear can
destroy them in single passes or

195
00:09:33,127 --> 00:09:34,417
destroy parts of it in a single pass.

196
00:09:34,417 --> 00:09:37,880
You gotta remember like a bottom trawl
has the net of a certain size, and

197
00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:41,824
when that drags across the bottom,
it just picks up everything and could

198
00:09:41,824 --> 00:09:46,814
destroy coral , and sponges that
create the habitat for these fish.

199
00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,957
There's other bottom species
as well, but this is probably

200
00:09:49,957 --> 00:09:50,997
ones we're most familiar with.

201
00:09:51,370 --> 00:09:54,520
So fisheries management isn't only about,
like fish population numbers, it's about

202
00:09:54,520 --> 00:09:56,290
protecting the physical seafloor habitat.

203
00:09:56,534 --> 00:09:59,964
And it's treated as its own public
policy and its own priority.

204
00:10:00,177 --> 00:10:03,197
Marine protected areas doesn't
just protect fish, it protects

205
00:10:03,197 --> 00:10:04,427
the habitat the fish live in.

206
00:10:04,850 --> 00:10:07,757
When you can protect the bottom
or where these fish are living,

207
00:10:07,757 --> 00:10:09,117
you end up protecting the fish.

208
00:10:09,590 --> 00:10:13,620
And actually that's an interesting segue
is that when the Harper government got in

209
00:10:13,630 --> 00:10:19,264
in Canada, they pretty much deregulated
all habitat protection within the

210
00:10:19,264 --> 00:10:23,354
Fisheries Act back in like 2012 to 2015,
before the Trudeau government got in.

211
00:10:23,804 --> 00:10:26,530
The reason why they did that, they
said, "Hey, we just want to manage

212
00:10:26,530 --> 00:10:29,020
fisheries, so we just wanna manage
the fish, not the habitats that

213
00:10:29,020 --> 00:10:30,094
they go in, that they live in.

214
00:10:30,174 --> 00:10:32,330
We just wanna manage the fisheries,
the commercial fisheries.

215
00:10:32,484 --> 00:10:33,274
That's all we should manage.

216
00:10:33,274 --> 00:10:35,454
We shouldn't manage anything else,"
even though they were related.

217
00:10:35,837 --> 00:10:38,997
But they didn't care about that because
probably one of their supporters wanted

218
00:10:38,997 --> 00:10:42,130
to fish more, and they paid a lot of
money for their campaign to get that done.

219
00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:45,612
So in Corbin when the Fisheries
Act was later revised by the

220
00:10:45,612 --> 00:10:48,145
Trudeau administration, they
started to put in more protections.

221
00:10:48,145 --> 00:10:51,792
They put back the habitat requirement
for protection, and they added more

222
00:10:51,792 --> 00:10:55,862
protections into the Fisheries Act to
make sure that it can't just be changed

223
00:10:55,862 --> 00:10:59,652
just willy-nilly as a government comes
through and wants to give more to oil

224
00:10:59,652 --> 00:11:04,352
and gas and other types of resource
intensive exploitation businesses.

225
00:11:04,922 --> 00:11:09,689
Now, going back to this bottom trawling,
policy, the 2006 protections for

226
00:11:09,689 --> 00:11:13,479
seamounts and corals were a hard-fought
compromise, by getting those extra things

227
00:11:13,489 --> 00:11:18,519
like getting the impact assessments after
an outright trawling ban failed in 2004.

228
00:11:18,519 --> 00:11:19,579
So they went for everything.

229
00:11:19,599 --> 00:11:21,459
They couldn't get it, they
went for the next best thing.

230
00:11:21,849 --> 00:11:25,959
And then the fight, like the same
fight over how far to go is playing

231
00:11:25,959 --> 00:11:29,299
out again and again and now in
the 2026 in the UN review, so

232
00:11:29,309 --> 00:11:30,949
hopefully we'll be able to get that.

233
00:11:31,375 --> 00:11:34,045
And so, the person I'm gonna be
interviewing on Friday states that,

234
00:11:34,045 --> 00:11:37,495
like, whether the resolution is agreement
that you want to happen, you know,

235
00:11:37,495 --> 00:11:41,492
they remember about getting it passed
after a 2004 moratorium push failed.

236
00:11:41,922 --> 00:11:45,652
And what they make out of is the new
push happening this year to actually

237
00:11:45,692 --> 00:11:47,672
end seamount trawling by 2027.

238
00:11:47,949 --> 00:11:51,839
It's a step-by-step
process to get things done.

239
00:11:52,065 --> 00:11:54,425
Things don't happen quickly.

240
00:11:54,812 --> 00:11:58,709
And I think a lot of the times when
we look at putting in regulations, I

241
00:11:58,709 --> 00:12:02,899
think those of us who are not familiar
with how policies are made realize

242
00:12:02,909 --> 00:12:06,869
that we can't just wait till the last
minute to protect oceans, to protect

243
00:12:06,869 --> 00:12:08,229
the planet from climate change.

244
00:12:08,609 --> 00:12:11,594
We need to push forward and
actually be able to put in policy

245
00:12:11,693 --> 00:12:14,713
as soon as possible, because we
know it's not gonna be perfect.

246
00:12:14,922 --> 00:12:18,907
We know we're gonna have to build on
it every year, every two years, every

247
00:12:18,907 --> 00:12:23,197
recurring certain interval where we can
get it better and better and better.

248
00:12:23,751 --> 00:12:26,581
So we may not get exactly what we
want in the first pass, but by putting

249
00:12:26,581 --> 00:12:30,466
it together, history has shown that
we can make them better, we can make

250
00:12:30,466 --> 00:12:32,519
them tougher and protect better.

251
00:12:32,609 --> 00:12:36,592
And as we start to see successes or even
some failures, we can really start to

252
00:12:36,592 --> 00:12:37,782
rethink, be like, "This isn't working.

253
00:12:37,782 --> 00:12:38,662
We need to try this.

254
00:12:38,812 --> 00:12:39,962
This is working really well.

255
00:12:39,982 --> 00:12:40,902
Let's continue with this.

256
00:12:40,902 --> 00:12:45,309
Let's expand on it." And without
having that as a tool and as a

257
00:12:45,309 --> 00:12:49,679
policy tool, we become just sort of
dead in the water, no pun intended.

258
00:12:50,152 --> 00:12:55,402
If you wanna help the ocean, you help
the people who want to pass the policies.

259
00:12:55,645 --> 00:12:57,185
Whether they're perfect or not.

260
00:12:57,492 --> 00:13:00,332
They're doing the best they can
to get to perfect, but they can't.

261
00:13:00,342 --> 00:13:03,412
They can't just get a ban on
trawling, as this example covered,

262
00:13:03,539 --> 00:13:06,429
but they can get close to a ban on
trawling, and that's what matters.

263
00:13:06,775 --> 00:13:08,595
And that's what matters
as we move forward.

264
00:13:08,709 --> 00:13:11,299
It helps our oceans bit
by bit, step by step.

265
00:13:11,909 --> 00:13:12,239
Okay?

266
00:13:12,412 --> 00:13:13,452
That's it for today's episode.

267
00:13:13,512 --> 00:13:14,432
Love to hear your thoughts.

268
00:13:14,462 --> 00:13:18,185
Let me know if you want to hit me up on
my socials, links in the show notes.

269
00:13:18,275 --> 00:13:20,775
And of course, don't forget to follow
this podcast if you like this kind of

270
00:13:20,775 --> 00:13:22,242
information, and share with a friend.

271
00:13:22,242 --> 00:13:23,622
Like, talk about it with people.

272
00:13:24,052 --> 00:13:25,782
Talk about the policies
that are put in place.

273
00:13:25,792 --> 00:13:28,629
Talk about how there needs to be a
step-by-step approach, and that the

274
00:13:28,629 --> 00:13:32,039
first policy that's put in place on a
specific subject like trawling, like deep

275
00:13:32,039 --> 00:13:33,669
sea trawling, doesn't always work out.

276
00:13:34,069 --> 00:13:36,412
And we need to build on that
as we go through, but we

277
00:13:36,412 --> 00:13:37,942
need to act fast to do it.

278
00:13:38,292 --> 00:13:41,672
That's how we build strong
protections for the oceans worldwide,

279
00:13:41,722 --> 00:13:43,072
not just country by country.

280
00:13:43,505 --> 00:13:46,585
But anyway, I wanna thank you so much
for joining me on today's episode of

281
00:13:46,585 --> 00:13:47,855
the How to Protect the Ocean podcast.

282
00:13:47,962 --> 00:13:48,892
I'm your host, Andrew Lewin.

283
00:13:48,902 --> 00:13:49,452
Have a great day.

284
00:13:49,452 --> 00:13:51,302
We'll talk to you tomorrow,
and happy conservation.