Why Saving the Ocean Still Runs Out of Money

Ocean conservation is a global effort worth billions, so why do so many marine scientists, nonprofits, and conservation groups still feel like they are constantly running out of money?
In this episode of How to Protect the Ocean, Andrew Lewin breaks down why ocean conservation often operates grant to grant, donation to donation, and year to year. He explains how unstable funding affects marine protected areas, research, staffing, outreach, and long-term planning.
The episode also explores why communication is becoming part of conservation infrastructure. In today’s funding landscape, the organizations that can tell their story clearly often have a better chance of attracting donors, partners, and public support.
Support Independent Podcasts: https://www.speakupforblue.com/patreon
Need help with your ocean non-profit, company, or project? Get the help you need with Pisces Oceans Inc.: https://www.piscesoceans.ca
Connect with Speak Up For Blue
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,689
Ocean conservation is a
multi-billion dollar global effort.
2
00:00:03,909 --> 00:00:07,759
So why do so many marine scientists
and nonprofits constantly feel
3
00:00:07,759 --> 00:00:09,579
like they're running out of money?
4
00:00:10,136 --> 00:00:13,366
This is the How to Protect the Ocean,
your weekday ocean news update.
5
00:00:13,676 --> 00:00:17,406
If you care about staying informed
about the ocean every weekday, hit
6
00:00:17,406 --> 00:00:20,376
that follow button right now so
you don't miss tomorrow's story.
7
00:00:20,446 --> 00:00:23,459
This week, we're gonna be
talking about nonprofits.
8
00:00:23,629 --> 00:00:25,946
We're gonna be talking about
how to generate revenue.
9
00:00:26,036 --> 00:00:27,816
We're gonna be talking about
some of the problems that we've
10
00:00:27,816 --> 00:00:29,326
identified from nonprofits.
11
00:00:29,326 --> 00:00:32,836
And on Friday, I've got an interview
with James Meissner, who is a nonprofit
12
00:00:32,836 --> 00:00:36,326
consultant that will give people
like yourselves who have nonprofits
13
00:00:36,409 --> 00:00:40,370
some way of coping and some way of
building that revenue so that you
14
00:00:40,370 --> 00:00:42,600
can actually run a proper nonprofit.
15
00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:45,500
So we're gonna talk about that all
today, 'cause people often assume
16
00:00:45,500 --> 00:00:48,616
that if an ocean issue is important
enough, someone is gonna fund it.
17
00:00:48,786 --> 00:00:50,146
That's really what it comes down to.
18
00:00:50,186 --> 00:00:52,839
And unfortunately, that's not
always the case because that's
19
00:00:52,839 --> 00:00:54,600
not really how conservation works.
20
00:00:54,796 --> 00:00:58,626
In reality, many ocean conservation
organizations are operating on
21
00:00:58,626 --> 00:01:01,956
a year-to-year, grant-to-grant,
or donation-donation basis.
22
00:01:02,049 --> 00:01:05,310
Even some of the most important marine
conservation projects in the world
23
00:01:05,359 --> 00:01:08,080
struggle to maintain long-term funding.
24
00:01:08,403 --> 00:01:10,393
And that creates a major question.
25
00:01:10,633 --> 00:01:13,453
If we already know so much
about protecting the ocean, why
26
00:01:13,453 --> 00:01:16,843
does ocean conservation still
feel financially unstable?
27
00:01:17,203 --> 00:01:21,003
Marine conservation in general just
sounds massive, and to be honest, it is.
28
00:01:21,256 --> 00:01:24,023
But according to multiple
international reports, ocean
29
00:01:24,023 --> 00:01:27,313
protection receives a small fraction
of global environmental funding.
30
00:01:27,783 --> 00:01:29,643
I've seen that for all of my career.
31
00:01:29,846 --> 00:01:33,373
I've worked on projects where there's
been a huge funder whether it be in
32
00:01:33,373 --> 00:01:36,386
the industrial region, like oil and
gas or things like that, and they are
33
00:01:36,386 --> 00:01:40,996
watching every nickel and dime that
they are spending on their project
34
00:01:40,996 --> 00:01:43,839
because they don't want to spend a lot
on environmental projects because they
35
00:01:43,839 --> 00:01:46,923
realize that if they spend a lot and
they do a thorough job, that thorough
36
00:01:46,923 --> 00:01:48,563
jobs may say, "Hey, you know what?
37
00:01:48,563 --> 00:01:50,803
You shouldn't be doing what you're
doing here from an industrial
38
00:01:50,803 --> 00:01:54,469
standpoint." And so we start to see
just taking away the money and trying
39
00:01:54,469 --> 00:01:57,566
to spend a little as much possible
in environmental funding because
40
00:01:57,566 --> 00:01:58,806
they don't wanna get involved in it.
41
00:01:59,059 --> 00:02:02,739
Many marine protected areas exist
mostly on paper because there isn't
42
00:02:02,739 --> 00:02:06,616
enough money for enforcement, staffing,
research or monitoring, which we covered
43
00:02:06,616 --> 00:02:09,946
in the week that we talked about marine
conservation and marine protected areas.
44
00:02:10,159 --> 00:02:14,059
So science may identify critical habitats,
governments may announce protected
45
00:02:14,059 --> 00:02:18,289
areas, but without long-term investment,
protection often becomes symbolic, and
46
00:02:18,289 --> 00:02:20,449
funding is incredibly competitive.
47
00:02:20,736 --> 00:02:23,546
Thousands of nonprofits,
universities, indigenous groups,
48
00:02:23,546 --> 00:02:26,449
and conservation organizations
are applying for the same grants.
49
00:02:26,449 --> 00:02:30,139
So the competition has increased,
and the funding hasn't necessarily
50
00:02:30,139 --> 00:02:33,513
increased in the way that the
amount of competition has increased.
51
00:02:33,659 --> 00:02:36,659
That means organizations spend
huge amounts of time trying
52
00:02:36,659 --> 00:02:40,836
to secure funding instead of
directly protecting ecosystems.
53
00:02:40,866 --> 00:02:43,576
I can't tell you the number of people
that are scientists who have started
54
00:02:43,576 --> 00:02:46,616
organizations, have done a really good
job at maintaining these organizations
55
00:02:46,616 --> 00:02:49,059
for a long time, but they can't do
the science that they wanna do or
56
00:02:49,059 --> 00:02:51,963
the conservation that they wanna do
because they're always on proposals.
57
00:02:52,119 --> 00:02:55,479
It is one of the big headaches
of nonprofit management.
58
00:02:55,776 --> 00:03:00,076
Some researchers spend months writing
proposals with no guarantee of success.
59
00:03:00,076 --> 00:03:03,016
I know some organizations have shut
down because they didn't get the
60
00:03:03,016 --> 00:03:05,766
grants that they were supposed to get
and that's a tough pill to swallow.
61
00:03:06,029 --> 00:03:09,799
Others rely on short-term contracts
tied to political priorities that
62
00:03:09,799 --> 00:03:11,759
can disappear after elections.
63
00:03:11,799 --> 00:03:13,379
I wonder where we saw that before.
64
00:03:13,603 --> 00:03:16,183
And this instability affects everything.
65
00:03:16,523 --> 00:03:21,356
Research timelines, staff retention,
community programs, long-term
66
00:03:21,356 --> 00:03:23,886
planning, even public outreach.
67
00:03:24,189 --> 00:03:25,799
There's another layer to this.
68
00:03:25,899 --> 00:03:28,849
Funding increasingly follows visibility.
69
00:03:29,236 --> 00:03:32,996
Organizations that communicate
clearly often have a better chance of
70
00:03:32,996 --> 00:03:34,896
attracting donors and partnerships.
71
00:03:35,153 --> 00:03:39,723
I've watched organizations have a
really good and really great presence
72
00:03:39,723 --> 00:03:43,019
on social media, a really good
backing and showing all the stuff that
73
00:03:43,019 --> 00:03:44,869
they're doing, and sometimes I'm like,
"I wonder why they're doing that."
74
00:03:44,869 --> 00:03:47,979
It just kinda shows off that they
have all this grant management or
75
00:03:47,979 --> 00:03:50,259
they have all this money they're
getting from foundations because
76
00:03:50,259 --> 00:03:51,659
they can show off what they're doing.
77
00:03:51,803 --> 00:03:53,823
And sometimes you're like, "How
are they doing this?" Like, how are
78
00:03:53,823 --> 00:03:55,043
they getting all this stuff done?
79
00:03:55,136 --> 00:03:58,336
Their presence on social media,
their presence in their communication
80
00:03:58,336 --> 00:04:01,859
aspect shows what they're able
to do, which brings eyes to the
81
00:04:01,859 --> 00:04:05,269
organizations, which brings, "Hey,
this person is doing really well."
82
00:04:05,549 --> 00:04:06,569
As an example.
83
00:04:06,653 --> 00:04:08,403
I've been podcasting for 11 years.
84
00:04:08,433 --> 00:04:10,913
You've probably heard me say that a
lot of times on this podcast if you've
85
00:04:10,913 --> 00:04:12,563
been listening any time recently.
86
00:04:12,833 --> 00:04:16,229
But since I've been doing that,
I haven't necessarily posted on
87
00:04:16,229 --> 00:04:19,709
social media on a consistent basis
until, like, the last year or so.
88
00:04:19,949 --> 00:04:22,889
And when I started to do that, I started
to post on LinkedIn, like clips from
89
00:04:22,889 --> 00:04:26,743
my episodes, and on TikTok and on
Instagram, then people are like, "Wow,
90
00:04:26,743 --> 00:04:29,853
you're really working hard. You're really
doing a lot in podcasting." And I'm
91
00:04:29,853 --> 00:04:31,429
like, " I've been doing this for 11 years.
92
00:04:31,429 --> 00:04:34,086
I've been doing this for many
times, as many years that
93
00:04:34,086 --> 00:04:34,986
I've been doing this, really.
94
00:04:35,036 --> 00:04:38,336
I've been doing it for so long." And
they're just like, "I just noticed
95
00:04:38,336 --> 00:04:41,086
you do it now 'cause it starts coming
up on my feed, and I really like
96
00:04:41,086 --> 00:04:44,216
what you're saying." But they won't
necessarily listen to the podcast.
97
00:04:44,216 --> 00:04:47,443
It doesn't increase downloads to my
podcast or doesn't necessarily grow
98
00:04:47,443 --> 00:04:50,299
the show, but it shows that I'm
actually doing work, and I'm getting
99
00:04:50,299 --> 00:04:51,959
more eyes on the stuff that I'm doing.
100
00:04:52,336 --> 00:04:55,376
Doesn't necessarily mean it's gonna
grow the show, but it does help in
101
00:04:55,376 --> 00:04:58,866
making that appearance of like, "Hey,
you're actually working really hard on
102
00:04:58,866 --> 00:05:01,513
this. People come up to me and they're
like, " Well, you've been doing so much
103
00:05:01,513 --> 00:05:02,653
work. Like, how much time do you spend?"
104
00:05:02,653 --> 00:05:04,503
And I start talking about my workflow
and how much I do, and they're
105
00:05:04,503 --> 00:05:08,286
like, "Wow, I can't believe you're
actually able to do this." But it
106
00:05:08,286 --> 00:05:12,136
means that storytelling is becoming
part of conservation infrastructure.
107
00:05:12,256 --> 00:05:15,856
And this is why you see how ocean
organizations investing heavily
108
00:05:15,856 --> 00:05:20,196
in social media, documentaries,
podcasts, YouTube videos, newsletters,
109
00:05:20,196 --> 00:05:24,106
and influencer partnerships, not
because communication is trendy,
110
00:05:24,506 --> 00:05:29,596
but because the attention drives
support, and support drives survival.
111
00:05:29,913 --> 00:05:32,913
A scientific paper may contain
critical findings, but if the
112
00:05:32,913 --> 00:05:36,149
public never hears about it, it
becomes much harder to generate
113
00:05:36,149 --> 00:05:38,103
political pressure or donor interest.
114
00:05:38,143 --> 00:05:41,269
I'm not saying that scientific
publications are not important.
115
00:05:41,373 --> 00:05:44,263
They are important to maintaining
a scientific integrity.
116
00:05:44,469 --> 00:05:48,449
But you still have to go out into
the masses and speak to the donor
117
00:05:48,449 --> 00:05:51,493
and the people that you are talking
to that are helping fund your
118
00:05:51,493 --> 00:05:53,823
organization and have that communication.
119
00:05:53,936 --> 00:05:57,266
Large organizations have a huge
funding department, or probably more
120
00:05:57,266 --> 00:05:59,696
staff in their funding department
or their development department
121
00:05:59,696 --> 00:06:02,619
than they do in their actual science
department or their conservation
122
00:06:02,619 --> 00:06:04,244
department or their advocacy department.
123
00:06:04,508 --> 00:06:06,698
Because they need to have these
relationships and continue to
124
00:06:06,698 --> 00:06:09,731
build these relationships to allow
that money to continue to come.
125
00:06:09,931 --> 00:06:13,541
' Cause if you don't perform and
so to speak, for these donors,
126
00:06:13,811 --> 00:06:14,721
why are they gonna do it?
127
00:06:14,721 --> 00:06:17,661
If you don't relate the work that
you're doing to these donors and
128
00:06:17,661 --> 00:06:20,714
what their mission is and what their
message is and why they donated in
129
00:06:20,714 --> 00:06:22,328
the first place, you can't help.
130
00:06:22,358 --> 00:06:24,868
And so if you don't have that
communication aspect, whether it's
131
00:06:24,868 --> 00:06:28,028
to one donor or many, or even just
an audience that if you're getting
132
00:06:28,028 --> 00:06:31,364
funding from many people, you're
not looking at driving anything.
133
00:06:31,654 --> 00:06:34,554
That's a tough pill to swallow
for a lot of people when
134
00:06:34,554 --> 00:06:35,794
you're doing this type of work.
135
00:06:36,154 --> 00:06:40,298
So all this stuff, it creates
a difficult balancing act.
136
00:06:40,658 --> 00:06:45,664
Scientists need accuracy, but online
platforms reward emotion and simplicity.
137
00:06:45,884 --> 00:06:48,044
So it's a very different
way of communicating.
138
00:06:48,371 --> 00:06:51,691
Organizations are constantly
trying to simplify complex ocean
139
00:06:51,691 --> 00:06:53,661
issues with losing nuance.
140
00:06:53,721 --> 00:06:57,461
And honestly, some issues are
easier to communicate than others.
141
00:06:57,678 --> 00:07:00,428
Like sea turtles and whales
attract public attention quickly.
142
00:07:00,428 --> 00:07:03,058
If you show a video of a whale
breaching, that's pretty cool.
143
00:07:03,058 --> 00:07:05,688
In front of like, say, a whale-watching
boat, that's pretty cool.
144
00:07:05,688 --> 00:07:07,048
That's a really fun thing to watch.
145
00:07:07,078 --> 00:07:09,261
Or have a picture of that, that's
a really fun thing to see.
146
00:07:09,261 --> 00:07:12,021
That's gonna catch the eye of somebody
on Instagram say, "I wonder what this
147
00:07:12,021 --> 00:07:15,321
is all about." But fisheries management
policy is usually pretty boring.
148
00:07:15,541 --> 00:07:16,871
They're not really gonna say anything.
149
00:07:17,004 --> 00:07:20,884
Unless you have an image of something
really compelling and talking about it to
150
00:07:20,984 --> 00:07:23,714
your potential donors or to your audience.
151
00:07:23,714 --> 00:07:26,254
That's what really, really
matters in this situation.
152
00:07:26,581 --> 00:07:31,038
But fisheries policy may affect
food security, jobs, and ecosystem
153
00:07:31,038 --> 00:07:32,438
collapse far more directly.
154
00:07:32,438 --> 00:07:33,528
It may be more important.
155
00:07:33,528 --> 00:07:36,001
It's like every time I talk about
biodiversity, it doesn't get a lot
156
00:07:36,001 --> 00:07:39,091
of downloads compared to my other
episodes, say, on whales or sharks
157
00:07:39,091 --> 00:07:40,258
or sea turtles or anything like that.
158
00:07:40,351 --> 00:07:43,068
But it's probably one of the most
important things 'cause it'll save whales
159
00:07:43,068 --> 00:07:44,968
and sharks and sea turtles, right?
160
00:07:45,174 --> 00:07:48,034
Now, this is kind of something
that's been really interesting for me
161
00:07:48,064 --> 00:07:53,754
because I have developed this science
communication role in myself by doing
162
00:07:53,754 --> 00:07:57,524
this podcast and by looking at how I
communicate using newsletters, YouTube
163
00:07:57,524 --> 00:08:01,494
videos, and also social media, different
platforms and so forth, and continuing
164
00:08:01,494 --> 00:08:04,838
to create content to not only just
grow my show, but to expand my message.
165
00:08:04,924 --> 00:08:06,794
So I've learned a lot about
science communication.
166
00:08:06,794 --> 00:08:10,091
So much so that I've been recently hired,
I've been there for a month, at Pisces
167
00:08:10,091 --> 00:08:12,141
Ocean as the Oceans Communication Manager.
168
00:08:12,284 --> 00:08:15,194
And what's really great is that
Pisces is actually sponsoring
169
00:08:15,308 --> 00:08:17,831
this episode and this podcast.
170
00:08:17,911 --> 00:08:21,344
And what's really great is Pisces
actually works as a consultant.
171
00:08:21,571 --> 00:08:25,331
We're a consultancy firm, and we work
with clients, whether from the nonprofit
172
00:08:25,331 --> 00:08:28,991
sector, the for-profit sector, or
academic projects like large academic
173
00:08:28,991 --> 00:08:30,674
projects or even small academic projects.
174
00:08:30,801 --> 00:08:33,901
We work with organizations to
amplify their message to help them
175
00:08:33,901 --> 00:08:37,498
get funded So you're not always
looking for funding, but this is like
176
00:08:37,498 --> 00:08:40,588
once you get this started, once you
get a strategy, and once you start
177
00:08:40,588 --> 00:08:44,428
getting this produced, you start
increasing that money that's coming in.
178
00:08:44,428 --> 00:08:48,238
You start increasing that attention first,
and then the money will eventually follow.
179
00:08:48,374 --> 00:08:51,181
But it has to come with a
good plan with communication.
180
00:08:51,181 --> 00:08:56,264
So if you wanna check out what Pisces
is all about, go to piscesoceans.ca.
181
00:08:56,264 --> 00:08:59,524
That's piscesoceans.ca
for more information.
182
00:08:59,524 --> 00:09:02,204
If you have any questions, you
can just hit me up on any of
183
00:09:02,204 --> 00:09:03,534
my socials that I've put below.
184
00:09:03,738 --> 00:09:05,581
DM me, message me on LinkedIn.
185
00:09:05,741 --> 00:09:07,201
I'd be more than happy to chat with you.
186
00:09:07,201 --> 00:09:10,281
If you're having trouble raising
funds, having communication,
187
00:09:10,281 --> 00:09:13,461
even finding the time to do
communication, we can provide that.
188
00:09:13,461 --> 00:09:15,071
We have a thing called Pisces Points.
189
00:09:15,101 --> 00:09:15,831
It's really great.
190
00:09:15,831 --> 00:09:16,808
You do a strategy.
191
00:09:16,931 --> 00:09:17,861
We do Pisces Points.
192
00:09:17,901 --> 00:09:20,491
It's awesome, and we can
really get you started quickly.
193
00:09:20,521 --> 00:09:25,741
So check that out, piscesoceans.ca, and
I'll put that link in the show notes.
194
00:09:25,741 --> 00:09:26,641
So check that out.
195
00:09:26,788 --> 00:09:29,504
It's a new thing that I'm doing,
and I'm loving my job, and I
196
00:09:29,504 --> 00:09:31,014
love working with organizations.
197
00:09:31,158 --> 00:09:31,798
It's a lot of fun.
198
00:09:31,798 --> 00:09:34,868
We do a lot of cool things, not just
communication strategies, but everything,
199
00:09:34,948 --> 00:09:36,068
and I'm having a blast doing it.
200
00:09:36,068 --> 00:09:39,044
So come work with me as a
client, and I would love to help
201
00:09:39,044 --> 00:09:40,324
you out with our great team.
202
00:09:40,588 --> 00:09:40,908
All right.
203
00:09:40,908 --> 00:09:44,198
So let's get back into the episode
'cause we wanna know what happens next.
204
00:09:44,198 --> 00:09:45,828
Like, what's the future gonna look like?
205
00:09:46,078 --> 00:09:48,628
And to be honest, I think ocean
conservation is entering a period where
206
00:09:48,628 --> 00:09:53,031
financial sustainability becomes just
as important as scientific discovery.
207
00:09:53,178 --> 00:09:57,184
We need organizations like nonprofit
organizations and for-profit
208
00:09:57,184 --> 00:10:00,544
organizations to really step up for
the ocean because we're seeing a lot of
209
00:10:00,544 --> 00:10:02,494
governments step back from the ocean.
210
00:10:02,494 --> 00:10:06,574
They just don't have the funding, or
political parties have different types of
211
00:10:06,574 --> 00:10:11,338
strategies or different types of values
that don't always include the ocean.
212
00:10:11,338 --> 00:10:14,484
And so we need to have the
organizations step up even more.
213
00:10:14,484 --> 00:10:18,104
So we need them financially sustainable
so that we can actually continue on with
214
00:10:18,104 --> 00:10:19,624
some of the great work that they do.
215
00:10:19,924 --> 00:10:22,614
So organizations are looking
for some stable funding models.
216
00:10:22,741 --> 00:10:24,964
Some are building partnerships
with corporations.
217
00:10:25,144 --> 00:10:28,814
Others are developing memberships,
media platforms, educational products,
218
00:10:28,908 --> 00:10:31,048
or even community-driven funding.
219
00:10:31,394 --> 00:10:34,534
There's a growing discussion around
whether government should fund
220
00:10:34,534 --> 00:10:38,274
conservation infrastructure more like
public services instead of relying
221
00:10:38,274 --> 00:10:39,944
so heavily on donations and grants.
222
00:10:40,091 --> 00:10:41,621
But here's the reality.
223
00:10:42,021 --> 00:10:44,581
The ocean supports global food systems.
224
00:10:44,824 --> 00:10:46,234
It regulates climate.
225
00:10:46,544 --> 00:10:50,454
It supports tourism, shipping,
jobs, and coastal economies.
226
00:10:50,748 --> 00:10:53,518
Yet many of the people trying
to protect it are working in
227
00:10:53,518 --> 00:10:55,538
financially unstable systems.
228
00:10:55,851 --> 00:10:59,984
And that creates risk because conservation
only works when institutions are
229
00:10:59,984 --> 00:11:04,368
strong enough to survive long-term, not
grant to grant, donation to donation.
230
00:11:04,368 --> 00:11:07,008
That's not really what is
what we're talking about here.
231
00:11:07,301 --> 00:11:11,714
If ocean conservation constantly operates
in survival mode, long-term protection
232
00:11:11,714 --> 00:11:15,989
becomes much harder to achieve So I
want you to follow this podcast right
233
00:11:15,989 --> 00:11:19,499
now if you haven't followed it before,
so that you can get all the updates.
234
00:11:19,499 --> 00:11:21,549
We post from Monday to Friday.
235
00:11:21,549 --> 00:11:25,269
And for this week, we are gonna
be posting all about nonprofit and
236
00:11:25,269 --> 00:11:26,879
how you can survive as a nonprofit.
237
00:11:26,879 --> 00:11:30,613
So if you have recently started a
nonprofit, or you have one, or you're
238
00:11:30,613 --> 00:11:33,423
working with one, and you guys are
always struggling for funding, and
239
00:11:33,423 --> 00:11:36,483
that's nothing to be ashamed of,
this happens to a lot of people and
240
00:11:36,693 --> 00:11:39,669
a lot of organizations, I'm here
to try and help with this week.
241
00:11:39,816 --> 00:11:43,233
And at the end of the week, we have
James Meisner, who is on the podcast,
242
00:11:43,233 --> 00:11:46,683
where I did an interview talking about
what he does as a nonprofit consultant.
243
00:11:46,773 --> 00:11:49,459
He's got some great tips as
an ocean nonprofit, make
244
00:11:49,459 --> 00:11:50,679
sure you are raising funds.
245
00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:51,553
So check that out.
246
00:11:51,749 --> 00:11:52,866
That's it for this episode.
247
00:11:52,866 --> 00:11:54,066
I'd love to hear your feedback.
248
00:11:54,066 --> 00:11:57,116
Hit me up on my socials down in the
show notes below, or you can go to
249
00:11:57,116 --> 00:12:03,239
speakupforblue.com/feedback, and you can
just hit me up, write a text or type out a
250
00:12:03,239 --> 00:12:05,199
message, or even record a voice message.
251
00:12:05,379 --> 00:12:06,299
I would love to hear from you.
252
00:12:06,549 --> 00:12:09,229
I wanna thank you so much for
joining me on today's episode of the
253
00:12:09,229 --> 00:12:10,459
How to Protect the Ocean podcast.
254
00:12:10,639 --> 00:12:11,559
I'm your host, Andrew Lewin.
255
00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:12,169
Have a great day.
256
00:12:12,169 --> 00:12:14,319
We'll talk to you next time,
and happy conservation.













